Special Report: 5 Common Colocation Myths

April 1, 2020
Many myths have emerged about the quality and reliability of colocation services, as well as the level of customer control. There are five common misperceptions about colocation in particular. 

In a new special report from CoreSite and Data Center Frontier, we take a look at how colocation can be the “nervous system” of today’s modern digital businesses. The second entry in this special report series work to dispel common colocation myths and perceptions around topics like customer control, availability guarantees, performance penalties and more. 

Download the full report. (Report Cover Image: Kkssr/Shutterstock)

Colocation myths

Because colocation has evolved rapidly in a constantly shifting landscape, many myths have developed about the quality and reliability of colocation services as well as the level of control customers retain. But the reality is that cloud infrastructure and colocation not only have a lot in common but complement each other.

There are five common misperceptions about colocation in particular. 

Perception #1

The customer has little or no control over infrastructure.

Fact: Customers own the equipment they place in a colocation center and have access to it 24 hours a day. The provider is responsible for providing power, network and cooling infrastructure and often offers availability service level agreements for customers who value that peace of mind. The provider doesn’t manage customer workloads and has zero visibility into the programs they run. While the responsibility is on the customer to maintain software and balance workloads, the same would be true in an on-premises data center.

Customers in regulated industries, in particular, value having that level of security and control. In the meantime, sharing the costs of power, floor space and common infrastructure such as backup provides economies of scale that save customers money. Small companies can enjoy the same robust data center features as giant enterprises. 

Perception #2

Equipment is less secure when moved off site. 

Fact: The opposite is true; only the largest enterprises come close to matching the security features of colocation facilities. Physical security controls typically include security cameras, biometric authentication, double door “mantrap” entry and locked cages and cabinets. Employees at the leading colocation providers are trained in best-in-class security procedures, must pass certification exams and receive rigorous ongoing training. Security systems and protocols are tested regularly, and facilities comply with leading standards such as ISO 27001, SOC HIPAA and PCI DSS. Maintaining such a high level of security is all but unaffordable for most customers.

Perception #3

There are no availability guarantees in a colocation arrangement. 

Fact: Any reputable colocation provider offers service level agreements that guarantee availability levels and provide penalties if they aren’t met. But fulfilling SLAs is rarely a problem. Leading colocation facilities employ a full suite of high-availability technology like redundant power supplies, backup generators, fire suppression systems, disaster recovery facilities and highly available multi-region cloud architectures. Few customers can afford to install and maintain such complete protections on their own premises. This enables CoreSite, for example, to offer a 100% uptime SLA. 

Because colocation has evolved rapidly in a constantly shifting landscape, many myths have developed about the quality and reliability of colocation services as well as the level of control customers retain.

Perception #4

Colocation extracts a performance penalty because equipment is offsite. 

Fact: Performance is usually better than that of equipment housed on-premises because colocation providers use state-of-the-art server racks and cooling equipment. The performance benefit is particularly pronounced when cloud connectivity is required because colocation centers maintain high-speed and dedicated connections to cloud on-ramps that are much faster than public Internet connections. 

Perception #5

Colocation is expensive.

Fact: Most customers save money compared to buying and maintaining their equipment on premises. That doesn’t include the intangible benefits of having access to faster bandwidth, better security controls, superior data protection, experienced staff and other byproducts of the economics of the multi-tenant model.

Catch up on the first entry in this special report series that explores real-time business, data centers and the colocation solution. 

And stay tuned. This special report from CoreSite and Data Center Frontier will also explore the following topics over the next two weeks.

  • Colo business and technical drivers
  • Understanding interconnection + why/when to use a colocation provider

Download the full report,How Colocation Can Be the Nervous System of Digital Business, courtesy of CoreSite and Data Center Frontier, that explores how colocation might just be the answer to remain competitive in today’s markets. 

About the Author

Paul Gillin

Paul Gillin is a speaker, writer and technology journalist who has written five books and more than 400 articles on the topic of social media and digital marketing. A technology journalist for 25 years, he has served as Enterprise Editor of the tech news site SiliconAngle since 2014. He was founding editor-in-chief of B2B technology publisher TechTarget, and served as editor-in-chief and executive editor of the technology weekly Computerworld.

Sponsored Recommendations

Tackling Utility Project Challenges with Fiberglass Conduit Elbows

Explore how fiberglass conduit elbows tackle utility project challenges like high costs, complex installations, and cable damage. Discover the benefits of durable, cost-efficient...

How Deep Does Electrical Conduit Need to Be Buried?

In industrial and commercial settings conduit burial depth can impact system performance, maintenance requirements, and overall project costs.

Understanding Fiberglass Conduit: A Comprehensive Guide

RTRC (Reinforced Thermosetting Resin Conduit) is an electrical conduit material commonly used by industrial engineers and contractors.

NECA Manual of Labor Rates Chart

See how Champion Fiberglass compares to PVC, GRC and PVC-coated steel in installation.

DALL·E, courtesy of EdgeConneX
Source: DALL·E, courtesy of EdgeConneX

Breaking Barriers in Rack Density: Why Liquid Cooling is the Key to Tomorrow's Data Centers

Phillip Marangella, Chief Marketing and Product Officer for EdgeConneX, explains why the adage "everything old is new again" only tells part of the story – especially when it ...

White Papers

cover_20241007_125112

Transforming Your Data Center Networking: Digital Twins and AI

Oct. 7, 2024
Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration is widely expected to become more integral to digital infrastructures in the coming years, significantly impacting networking technologies...