Special Report: 5 Common Colocation Myths

April 1, 2020
Many myths have emerged about the quality and reliability of colocation services, as well as the level of customer control. There are five common misperceptions about colocation in particular. 

In a new special report from CoreSite and Data Center Frontier, we take a look at how colocation can be the “nervous system” of today’s modern digital businesses. The second entry in this special report series work to dispel common colocation myths and perceptions around topics like customer control, availability guarantees, performance penalties and more. 

Download the full report. (Report Cover Image: Kkssr/Shutterstock)

Colocation myths

Because colocation has evolved rapidly in a constantly shifting landscape, many myths have developed about the quality and reliability of colocation services as well as the level of control customers retain. But the reality is that cloud infrastructure and colocation not only have a lot in common but complement each other.

There are five common misperceptions about colocation in particular. 

Perception #1

The customer has little or no control over infrastructure.

Fact: Customers own the equipment they place in a colocation center and have access to it 24 hours a day. The provider is responsible for providing power, network and cooling infrastructure and often offers availability service level agreements for customers who value that peace of mind. The provider doesn’t manage customer workloads and has zero visibility into the programs they run. While the responsibility is on the customer to maintain software and balance workloads, the same would be true in an on-premises data center.

Customers in regulated industries, in particular, value having that level of security and control. In the meantime, sharing the costs of power, floor space and common infrastructure such as backup provides economies of scale that save customers money. Small companies can enjoy the same robust data center features as giant enterprises. 

Perception #2

Equipment is less secure when moved off site. 

Fact: The opposite is true; only the largest enterprises come close to matching the security features of colocation facilities. Physical security controls typically include security cameras, biometric authentication, double door “mantrap” entry and locked cages and cabinets. Employees at the leading colocation providers are trained in best-in-class security procedures, must pass certification exams and receive rigorous ongoing training. Security systems and protocols are tested regularly, and facilities comply with leading standards such as ISO 27001, SOC HIPAA and PCI DSS. Maintaining such a high level of security is all but unaffordable for most customers.

Perception #3

There are no availability guarantees in a colocation arrangement. 

Fact: Any reputable colocation provider offers service level agreements that guarantee availability levels and provide penalties if they aren’t met. But fulfilling SLAs is rarely a problem. Leading colocation facilities employ a full suite of high-availability technology like redundant power supplies, backup generators, fire suppression systems, disaster recovery facilities and highly available multi-region cloud architectures. Few customers can afford to install and maintain such complete protections on their own premises. This enables CoreSite, for example, to offer a 100% uptime SLA. 

Because colocation has evolved rapidly in a constantly shifting landscape, many myths have developed about the quality and reliability of colocation services as well as the level of control customers retain.

Perception #4

Colocation extracts a performance penalty because equipment is offsite. 

Fact: Performance is usually better than that of equipment housed on-premises because colocation providers use state-of-the-art server racks and cooling equipment. The performance benefit is particularly pronounced when cloud connectivity is required because colocation centers maintain high-speed and dedicated connections to cloud on-ramps that are much faster than public Internet connections. 

Perception #5

Colocation is expensive.

Fact: Most customers save money compared to buying and maintaining their equipment on premises. That doesn’t include the intangible benefits of having access to faster bandwidth, better security controls, superior data protection, experienced staff and other byproducts of the economics of the multi-tenant model.

Catch up on the first entry in this special report series that explores real-time business, data centers and the colocation solution. 

And stay tuned. This special report from CoreSite and Data Center Frontier will also explore the following topics over the next two weeks.

  • Colo business and technical drivers
  • Understanding interconnection + why/when to use a colocation provider

Download the full report,How Colocation Can Be the Nervous System of Digital Business, courtesy of CoreSite and Data Center Frontier, that explores how colocation might just be the answer to remain competitive in today’s markets. 

About the Author

Paul Gillin

Paul Gillin is a speaker, writer and technology journalist who has written five books and more than 400 articles on the topic of social media and digital marketing. A technology journalist for 25 years, he has served as Enterprise Editor of the tech news site SiliconAngle since 2014. He was founding editor-in-chief of B2B technology publisher TechTarget, and served as editor-in-chief and executive editor of the technology weekly Computerworld.

Sponsored Recommendations

In this executive brief, we discuss the growing need for liquid cooling in data centers due to the increasing power demands of AI and high-performance computing. Discover how ...
AI hype has put data centers in the spotlight, sparking concerns over energy use—but they’re also key to a greener future. With renewable power and cutting-edge cooling, data ...
After a decade of stability, data center energy consumption is now set to surge—but can we change the trajectory? Discover how small efficiency gains could cut energy growth by...
Traditional data center power, cooling, and racks aren’t sufficient for GPU-based servers arranged in high-density AI clusters...

Adobe Stock, courtesy of Radix IoT
Source: Adobe Stock, courtesy of Radix IoT
Michael Skurla, co-founder of Radix IoT, explains how active, intelligent monitoring can extend data center lifespans while unlocking hidden capacity for AI innovation.

White Papers

Dcf Schneider64 Wp Cover 2022 02 10 9 39 54 230x300
Feb. 11, 2022
Energy efficiency has been a top priority for data center colocation providers over the past twenty years. Now, sustainability is a priority. In this white paper, Schneider Electric...